The views expressed in any article published in this blog are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Joseph Foster or Bob Lupoli.

Tuesday, November 23, 2010

Currency War! - P. Krugman: we don’t need China money!

BOB:  THE ASIAN CURRENCY DEBATE HAS BEGUN TWO ARTCILES THAT WILL GIVE YOU AN INSIGHT AS TO WHAT IS GOING ON.  CHINA IS RESISTING MY TAKE IS WE HAVE LEFT THE ISSUE DEAD FOR OVER 20 YEARS CURRENCY MANUPLATION IS NOT NEW WHEN THE POUND GOT TOO EXPENSIVE THE BRITISH DEVALUED THE POUND AND SOROS BET MADE HIM ONE BILLION DOLLARS .THE POUND WAS TWO US DOLLARS EQUAL ONE POUND NOW BECAUSE OF UK DEFCIT THE POUND IS WORTH $1.50. –JOE

Joe: what is money and what are treasury bills? Paper. (Badges! Badges! - we don’t need no stinking Chinese money). In the article below; Krugman is quoted, "...we don’t need China’s money – especially because the Federal Reserve could and should buy up any bonds the Chinese sell.”

This is true - the Federal Reserve can print, print, print. The value of the money goes down, down, down. (read up criticism of the Fed by the John Birch Society) The US doesn't need China's purchase of treasuries. They are going to get screwed. The Fed is not on the Gold Standard and since we are the largest market we can manipulate or force players to revalue their currency. Japan is our proxy in this fight & W. Europe will come on board with the US as well. No one can beat the US at a currency war.

Again I would only say - China has been cheating and everyone knows it, cheating in terms of currency valuation and also in the crappy products they send (dog food, toys, counterfeit goods, etc.) They have also been lying about the loans they have given out in their economy that will never be repaid, the tremendous corruption in government & business and the oppression of their own workers. They are also lying with statistics in the same way that Russia did. They are being forced to correct these things quicker than they want. This is the realpolitik. - Bob

 

Currency War

 Are you ready for a currency war?  Well, buckle up, because things are about to get interesting.  This week Japan fired what is perhaps the opening salvo in a new round of currency wars by publicly intervening in the foreign exchange market for the first time since 2004.  Japan’s bold 12 billion dollar move to push down the value of the yen made headlines all over the world.  Japan’s economy is highly dependent on exports and the Japanese government was becoming increasingly alarmed by the recent surge in the value of the yen.  A stronger yen makes Japanese exports more expensive for other nations and thus would harm Japanese industry.  But Japan is not the only nation that is ready to go to battle over currency rates.  The governments of the U.S. and China continue to exchange increasingly heated rhetoric regarding currency policy.  In Europe, there is growing sentiment that the euro needs to be devalued in order to help European exports become more competitive.  In addition, exporters all over the world are already loudly complaining about the possibility that the Federal Reserve is about to unleash another round of quantitative easing.  Virtually all major exporting nations want the value of the U.S. dollar to remain high so that they can keep flooding us with lots of cheap goods.  The sad reality is that our current system of globalized trade rewards exporting nations that have weak currencies, and many nations have now shown that they are willing to take the gloves off to make certain that their national currencies do not appreciate in value by too much.

Some nations have been involved in open currency manipulation for some time now.  For example, Singapore is well known for intervening in the foreign exchange market in order to benefit exporters.  Also, the Swiss National Bank experienced losses equivalent to about 15 billion dollars trying to stop the rapid rise of the Swiss franc earlier this year.

But as we race toward the end of 2010, currency manipulation is becoming a major issue on the world stage. Rumors that the Federal Reserve is considering a substantial new round of quantitative easing is already causing many major exporting nations around the world to howl in outrage.

Why?

Well, quantitative easing by the Federal Reserve could put substantial downward pressure on the value of the dollar and that would make exports significantly more expensive in the United States.  The reality is that even a relatively small change in the value of the U.S. dollar can have a major impact on exporters.

But what could really set off a massive currency war is the ongoing dispute between the U.S. and China. For years, China has kept the value of their currency artificially low.  Even though China has made a few small moves toward a more free-floating currency policy, at this point China’s currency is still pretty much pegged to the U.S. dollar.  It is estimated that the Chinese government is keeping China’s currency at a value about 40 percent lower than what it should be.  This is essentially a de facto subsidy to China’s exporters.

This has enabled China to flood the United States with cheap goods and it is killing entire industries in the United States.  Americans have loved rushing out to Wal-Mart to get super low prices on all kinds of stuff, but in the process we have slowly but surely been shipping our manufacturing base and our standard of living over to China.

In recent years both the Bush administration and the Obama administration have been whining about this currency manipulation by China, but both administrations have stopped short of taking any real action.

But are there now signs that the Obama administration is going to get serious and start a currency war? Well, last week Barack Obama did send the head of his national council of economic advisers, Larry Summers, to Beijing to discuss currency issues. But what can we do other than whine at this point?

Are we willing to start a trade war?

Considering the fact that China holds nearly a trillion dollars worth of U.S. Treasuries, that probably would not go so well for us. Even though China’s currency manipulation is absolutely raping the U.S. economy, China has so much leverage over us at this point that it isn’t even funny.

For example, China has almost a complete and total monopoly on rare earth elements.  If China totally cut off the supply of rare earth elements, we would have no hybrid car batteries, flat screen televisions, cell phones or iPods.  Not only that, but rare earth elements are used by the U.S. military in radar systems, missile-guidance systems, satellites and aircraft electronics.

But something has to be done.  Essentially we are caught between a rock and a hard place.

Today, the United States spends approximately $3.90 on Chinese goods for every $1 that the Chinese spend on goods from the United States.

Last month, the monthly trade deficit with China was approximately 26 billion dollars.  For the year, the trade deficit with China will be somewhere in the neighborhood of 300 billion dollars or so.  The transfer of wealth to China that represents is absolutely mind blowing.

The U.S. economy is getting poorer and the Chinese economy is getting richer each and every month. We are in decline and China is on the rise.  In fact, one prominent economist is projecting that the Chinese economy will be three times larger than the U.S. economy by the year 2040.

This would not have ever happened if we had not put up with China’s open and blatant currency manipulation all this time. But now they have us over a barrel and standing up to China would be incredibly painful for the U.S. economy in the short-term.

So will we actually see a currency war break out soon?

Well, it seems almost a certainly that countries throughout the world will continue to manipulate their currencies in order to gain a competitive advantage, but if you are waiting for the Obama administration to truly stand up to China you are probably going to be waiting for a very, very long time.

What’s In a Name: Can the U.S. Afford to Call China a Currency Manipulator?
Written by Money Morning - 9/17/10
It seems like every six months the debate over China’s currency, the yuan, reaches a fevered pitch: The Washington bureaucrats threaten to label China a “currency manipulator” and Beijing threatens to dump its U.S. debt holdings.

Then, with the imminent approach of a major inflection point – be it a key international summit or major financial report – both sides grudgingly agree that a modest appreciation of the yuan would be mutually beneficial. However, things could be slightly different this time around. China has routinely ducked calls to revalue its currency, and in doing so greatly agitated the West. Most recently, China removed the yuan’s peg to the dollar, ceding to months of U.S. and global pressure on the issue just ahead of the Group 20 summit in June. However, U.S. policymakers were again left feeling had as the currency has gained just 1.5% against the dollar since that announcement.

That pace is far too sluggish for U.S. lawmakers who are counting on U.S. exports to help pull the country out of its economic malaise and have grown increasingly impatient with Beijing’s unwillingness to compromise. “China does basically whatever it wants while we grow weaker and they grow stronger. We clearly need concrete action here,” said U.S. Sen. Christopher Dodd, D-CT. “This administration must be the one who takes a stand. For years the Treasury Department has relied on a strategy of dialogue which has yielded few meaningful reforms.”

U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner responded yesterday (Thursday) by taking his boldest steps yet in denouncing China’s uneven currency practices.  The rhetoric comes three months after China pledged to revalue its currency, the yuan, and one month before the Treasury Secretary will deliver a currency report that could officially label China as a currency manipulator.

In testimony before the House Ways and Means Committee, Geithner said China uses “heavy intervention” to keep the yuan undervalued – a practice that has created a “major distortion” in the global economy that is having a “negative impact” on the United States especially. The United States asserts that China deliberately keeps its currency undervalued to boost exports cheaper by making them cheaper for overseas buyers. Other countries – which include European nations as well as emerging markets like Brazil and India – have lobbed similar accusations.

“The pace of appreciation has been too slow and the extent of appreciation too limited,” said Geithner. “We are examining the important question of what mix of tools, those available to the United States and multilateral approaches, might help encourage the Chinese authorities to move more quickly.”Geithner said the Treasury would take China’s recent actions into account as it prepares its crucial Foreign Exchange Report. The Treasury’s biannual foreign exchange report is due in Congress next month. In that report, the Treasury will again be forced into a decision over whether or not it should officially label China a “currency manipulator.” Such a label would open the door to tariffs on Chinese imports.

Geithner has stopped short of affixing the currency manipulator label to China in his past three reports. He even pushed the release of its last report from April to June of this year to give China an opportunity to respond. However, time is running out for both parties to come to terms on the currency debate.“With the bilateral trade imbalance widening and U.S. unemployment still very high, there is a rising danger that China could misjudge the amount of movement needed to placate the U.S.,” Mark Williams of Capital Economics in London, told the Wall Street Journal. “Political developments can easily take on a momentum of their own.”

More than 140 House members have signed onto a bill sponsored by U.S. Reps. Tim Ryan, D-OH, and Tim Murphy, R-PA, that would impose countervailing duties against China.The United States on Wednesday brought two new cases to the World Trade Organization (WTO), accusing China of blocking imports of a specialty steel product and denying U.S. credit card companies access to its markets. The first case accused China of imposing duties of as much as 65% on U.S. flat-rolled electrical steel. The second dealt with China Union Pay, which since 2001 has had a monopoly on yuan-denominated debit and credit card payments in China.

U.S. Senator and chairman of the Senate Finance Committee Max Baucus, D-MT, applauded the filings, calling them “critical steps forward in our effort to enforce our market access rights in China.” “It’s about time the administration decided to act,” said U.S. Sen. Charles Grassley, R-IA. “The administration should go one step further and bring a case against China’s unfair currency manipulation at the WTO.”
Calls for a tougher stance on China will only heat up as the United States approaches mid-term elections in November.

“As the U.S. mid-term election nears, the temptation of grandstanding on China will be irresistible to most congressmen,” Eswar Prasad, Cornell University economist and the former head of the International Monetary Fund’s China department, told the Wall Street Journal. “Democrats and Republicans are trying to outdo each other in blustering about China’s currency and trade policies.”

Consequences of a Currency Conflict
Labeling China a currency manipulator or engaging the Red Dragon in an all out trade war will have consequences, but analysts are divided over what those consequences would be. When pressed on the currency issue, Beijing traditionally has threatened to stop financing U.S. debt. China is the world’s largest holder of U.S. Treasuries, with holdings of $846.7 billion in July. Lou Jiwei, chairman of China’s $300 billion sovereign wealth fund earlier this month said China should diversify its assets away from the dollar if the United States maintains loose monetary policy that weakens the currency.

“For China, the chief tools to reduce economic risks are to strengthen regulation of capital flows, control liquidity through cash management, monitor asset markets and divert foreign exchange reserves to non-dollar assets,” Lou said.

Ding Yifan, a policy guru at the Development Research Centre, said China could force a rise in U.S. interest rates by unloading its holdings of U.S. debt, estimated at over $1.5 trillion. His comments at a forum in Beijing followed a string of remarks by Chinese officials questioning US credit-worthiness and the reliability of the dollar.

However, such threats have hardly left some economists quaking. “They are utterly wrong,” Gabriel Stein from Lombard Street Research told The Guardian. “The lesson of the 1930s is that surplus countries with structurally weak domestic demand come off worst in a trade war.” Stein described the implicit threat to sell Treasuries as “empty bluster” because Beijing’s purchase of these bonds is a side effect of its yuan policy.

“Bring it on: it will weaken the dollar, which is what the U.S. wants. The interest rate effect can be countered by the Fed,” he said. “Some Chinese officials seem to believe that buying Treasuries underpins U.S. public spending. In fact China’s mercantilist policy is forcing the U.S. to run large deficits against its own interest. China should be terrified of a trade war.”

Stein is joined in that line of thinking by Nobel Prize winning economist Paul Krugman. Krugman said last week in the New York Times that “in a world awash with excess savings, we don’t need China’s money – especially because the Federal Reserve could and should buy up any bonds the Chinese sell.”
“It’s true that the dollar would fall if China decided to dump some American holdings,” he said. “But this would actually help the U.S. economy, making our exports more competitive. Ask the Japanese, who want China to stop buying their bonds because those purchases are driving up the yen.”

Japan on Wednesday intervened in the currency market for the first time since 2004 to weaken its currency, the yen, after China purchased Chinese bonds. Some analysts and Japanese policymakers had theorized that China was attempting to hamper Japan ’s recovery by keeping the yen excessively strong. “I don’t know the true intention” behind China’s purchase of $6.9 billion (583.1 billion yen) of Japanese government bonds in July, Finance Minister Yoshihiko Noda said earlier this month.

Interestingly, Japan, the second largest holder of Treasuries, was the biggest net buyer in July, boosting its portfolio by $17.4 billion to $821 billion. The gap between China and Japan has narrowed sharply this year, to just $25.7 billion from $129.1 billion at the end of 2009. Japan, which was the largest foreign owner of Treasuries until September 2008, could once again overtake China if it continues to intervene to hold down the value of the yen. “It would not be a total surprise to see Japan as the No.1 holder of Treasuries by the winter,” Dan Greenhaus, chief economic strategist at Miller Tabak & Co., told The Journal....

No comments:

Post a Comment